Skip to content

GPU Rental Prices

Hourly GPU rental prices across cloud providers, matched chip for chip.

  • 262,146price observations
  • 40providers
01

Sample

2 records

Datacenter SKU, on-demand

Representative, not a real quote. Schema is reconstructed from the variables the research paper measures; there is no published schema file. Price is per GPU-hour; the panel keeps price > 0.

gpu_prices.jsonl
{
  "observed_at": "2026-05-14T08:00:00Z",
  "provider": "provider-a",
  "canonical_sku": "H100_SXM_80GB",
  "raw_instance_name": "8x H100 80GB SXM5",
  "region": "us-east",
  "price_type": "on_demand",
  "price_per_gpu_hour_usd": 2.05,
  "gpu_count": 8,
  "capacity_available": 12,
  "source": "live_poll"
}

Consumer SKU, marketplace/spot

Representative. Consumer RTX class is the long-continuous-history segment of the panel.

gpu_prices.jsonl
{
  "observed_at": "2026-05-14T08:05:00Z",
  "provider": "provider-b",
  "canonical_sku": "RTX_4090_24GB",
  "raw_instance_name": "RTX 4090 24G",
  "region": "eu-central",
  "price_type": "spot",
  "price_per_gpu_hour_usd": 0.31,
  "gpu_count": 1,
  "source": "archived_snapshot"
}
02

Specifications

GPU Rental Prices specifications
FormatsParquet, JSON, CSV
DeliveryS3, REST API, Parquet
CadenceHourly snapshots, daily feature build
Coverage2024 to 2026
Price observations262,146 (six-month reference sample)
Providers40 (AWS, Azure, GCP, CoreWeave, Crusoe, Nebius, Lambda, Vast, RunPod, io.net + 30 more)
Canonical SKUs33 (GB200, B200, H200, H100, MI300X, A100, L40S, consumer RTX...)
GranularityHourly spot + on-demand, multi-region
RegionsAWS 17, Azure 57, plus marketplace geo strings
Companion tablesUtilization 1,366 rows; inference token pricing 2,397 quotes across 381 models
ProvenanceRow-level source URL, collection method, raw payload pointer
AccessFor internal research and model development; redistribution requires a separate agreement. Sourced from public pricing surfaces; no PII or MNPI.

What ships

  • Cross-Provider Price Surface

    Normalized hourly spot and on-demand rates per SKU per region across 40 providers. One schema, every cloud, with the source URL retained on every row.

  • Capacity & Utilization

    Provider capacity snapshots - total, available, and rented instances per SKU - a direct read on supply tightness.

  • Equity & Token Overlay

    GPU-hour pricing joined to AI-infrastructure equities, options implied volatility, and DePIN compute tokens.

Fields

10 fields

FieldDescription
observed_attimestamp · UTCWhen the price was polled or snapshotted.Example 2026-05-14T08:00:00Z
providerstringCloud or marketplace provider the quote came from.Example provider-a
canonical_skustringNormalized GPU identifier after collapsing marketplace spellings.Example H100_SXM_80GB
raw_instance_namestring · nullableOriginal provider listing string before normalization.Example 8x H100 80GB SXM5
regionstring · nullableProvider region or zone for the quote.Example us-east
price_typestringon_demand or spot/marketplace term.Example on_demand
price_per_gpu_hour_usdfloat · USD/GPU-hourNormalized rental price per single GPU-hour. The panel keeps price > 0.Example 2.05
gpu_countint · GPUs · nullableGPUs in the underlying instance, used to normalize to per-GPU.Example 8
capacity_availableint · instances · nullableCurrently available, unrented capacity for the SKU.Example 12
sourcestring · nullablelive_poll or archived_snapshot (the panel backfills from archives).Example live_poll
03

Quality checks

2 checks

GPU-price to AI-equity signal

Whether the cross-provider price and dispersion panel predicts the AI-infrastructure equity complex.

Build price and dispersion features; train walk-forward models against forward equity returns; validate with purged k-fold cross-validation and embargo, tested against a label-shuffled null and a naive-momentum baseline.

Honest published null. Under naive evaluation the backtest looked strong; under rigorous evaluation the edge disappears - shuffle-test p-value near 1.0. Verdict: not_ready. We would rather report a null than sell false alpha.

Cross-provider price dispersion

How widely the same accelerator is priced across the market.

Take the latest price per provider per SKU for SKUs listed by at least three providers; compute the priciest-to-cheapest ratio and coefficient of variation.

Descriptive and real: order-of-magnitude dispersion - 18.3x for H100 SXM, 96.5x for A100 SXM, 100x for RTX-4090, with coefficients of variation between roughly 0.5 and 2.6.

Ground truth

What is correctForward realized equity returns of the AI-infrastructure complex for the predictive test; the observed cross-provider quotes themselves for the descriptive layer.
How it is establishedWalk-forward modeling of price and dispersion features against forward returns, scored under purged k-fold cross-validation with embargo and benchmarked against a label-shuffled null and a naive-momentum baseline.
AgreementNot a human-rater task. Significance is measured against the null, and the signal fails it (shuffle-test p near 1.0).

How it is built

  1. 01

    Collection

    Poll each provider public pricing surface, hourly where available, and backfill from archived snapshots.

  2. 02

    SKU normalization

    Map heterogeneous instance names to a canonical SKU list so prices are comparable across providers - the many marketplace spellings of an 80GB SXM H100 collapse to one identifier.

  3. 03

    Per-hour price basis

    Normalize every quote to USD per GPU-hour and filter the panel to price greater than 0.

  4. 04

    Fixed-panel point-in-time reading

    Read trends within a fixed group of providers. The panel composition changes over time, so a recent median up-tick can be an artifact of new, pricier providers entering rather than a real price rise; this is treated explicitly.

  5. 05

    Coverage-depth handling

    Consumer GPUs have the longest continuous history; datacenter SKUs are broad in the current cross-section but thin historically. The asymmetry is handled explicitly throughout.

05RequestReplies usually within one working day

Request a sample

We send real records in the format you would receive, with the field list and where each record came from. Access for evaluation is limited and covered by a mutual NDA.

ProductGPU Rental Prices

team@gerra.com